Posted on

Ten Questions for 2018


It’s almost 2018, which means it’s time for my annual article of speculation.

For the last eight years, something that actually precedes halfwheel, I will ask ten questions that I am curious about for the upcoming year. In 364 or so days, Patrick Lagreid will revisit these questions and see how I did with my predictions.

The questions aren’t in any particular order, but they are below.

1. Which company will have more changes in 2018: Altadis U.S.A. or Davidoff of Geneva USA?

Competitors and customers rightfully raised an eyebrow when Oettinger Davidoff AG replaced its longtime chairman and very public ceo, particularly after the company’s extremely aggressive tenure with the latter. The changes didn’t stop for the company as it announced that Dylan Austin would succeed the retiring Jeff Lee as vp of sales in the U.S.

But Altadis U.S.A. underwent some massive changes in 2017 as well. The company replaced almost its entire marketing department, this coming after replacing its marketing agency the year prior. It brought in Rafael Nodal of Aging Room, then promoted him less than six months later. While the boss of bosses, Javier Estades, remains the same, much of the rest of the company’s leadership is relatively new. If there was going to be a year where Altadis U.S.A. massively changed, 2018 should be the year.

If you judge a company based on what its competitors think, both Drew Estate and General Cigar Co.—two of the other five largest players—had very good years, something that should and has concerned both.

Prediction: Altadis U.S.A. undergoes the larger changes. Nothing would surprise me in terms of where the company is this time next year, both good and bad.

2. Will there be a resolution to the FDA lawsuit in 2018?

Next month, a ruling on a motion that could suspend parts of the rule is expected. But that’s just a ruling on a motion, the actual trial part that most people think of when you recall Jerry Orbach in Law & Order hasn’t even started.

There’s a lot of variables at play with the lawsuit—just see the next question—but it’s always important to remember that lawsuits aren’t free and I don’t think anyone is advocating a strategy of delay, delay, delay.

Prediction: The lawsuit, or some part of it, will still be outstanding by this time next year.

3. Will the spending bill (omnibus) include an exemption for cigars and/or a predicate date change?

The latest can be found here.

In short, the spending bill that Congress will take up in January could include a provision that would exempt cigars from FDA regulation and/or a change in the grandfather date for all products. There have been attempts at adding both provisions to previous spending bills and they have failed.

Prediction: This is pure speculation: yes to the exemption, no to the date change.

4. Does Imperial or STG buy A.J. Fernández?

At the 2017 IPCPR Convention & Trade Show, Abdel Fernández was telling (some) people that there were offers to buy his company. Sources told halfwheel that he told them the offers were from Imperial Brands, plc—parent of Altadis and JR Cigar—and/or Scandinavian Tobaco Group, parent of Cigars International and General Cigar Co.

Both companies have been mentioned as potential buyers of A.J. Fernández for a while now. Not because either have made offers, as officials from both tell me they have not, but because both are gigantic companies that do a lot of business with A.J. Fernández and so the rumors seem credible enough.

And while officials at both companies tell me they don’t have plans to buy A.J. Fernández, executives at both companies seem concerned about what happens if the other does.

The question for 2018 and going forward is does a classic nuclear warfare scenario play out and the threat of one company buying AJF force the other to pull the trigger? While I don’t think that’s a likely scenario, I think it’s a more likely scenario than one of them just purchasing the company for normal reasons.

Prediction: AJF doesn’t get purchased in 2018.

5. What will Cigars International’s Texas stores look like?

Cigars International is coming to Texas and sure, I’m a bit biased, the retailer is moving 8.8 miles away from our office, from where I am writing this question.

But even if you aren’t in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, this is something to watch. Up until now, or mid-2018 when the first store is expected to open, Cigars International’s physical presence has been located in rural Pennsylvania. Now the world’s largest retailer is going into an established market with ground-up stores. While the company won’t confirm it, these stores will be seen for a model of what inevitably is coming to other states.

The industry has a giant fascination about which cigar brands are acquiring each other and while that’s gone on, Imperial Brands, plc—the largest competitor in cigar retail to Cigars International—has made an incredible push into brick-and-mortar retail, as well as a revamping of its non-physical retail business. Now it’s CI’s turn.

This would be interesting in and of itself, but given how trying of a year 2017 was for CI, it makes the new stores all the more interesting.

Prediction: Mini-versions of the Hamburg store and busy, very busy.

6. Will there be less than 20 lists on the 2018 version of The Consensus?

In 2011, we published the results of a project where I compiled as many top cigars lists from various publications, put them into a spreadsheet, and tried to figure out if there was any commonality.

That year I used 41 lists. Last year the number was down to 21.

There are a lot of reasons why the number of lists has been cut in half, including much more stringent requirements about which lists qualify, something that will only get more difficult this year.

Another fact that few people want to talk about is that the number of blogs has declined substantially.

Prediction: There will be more than 20, I’ll say around 26 largely thanks to the four hours I spent scouring YouTube last week for potential new entries. In fairness, I haven’t started compiling The Consensus and haven’t been keeping track of who has published a list this year and who has not.

7. Will the Tatuaje/L’Atelier Imports salesforce be majority in-house by the end of the year?

Five years ago, one of the most common inside baseball conversations amongst those in the cigar industry was when Pete Johnson would bring the Tatuaje salesforce “in house.” At the time—and for most of the company’s history—Johnson has employed a network of independent sales representatives, i.e. brokers, around the country.

That wasn’t uncommon, and plenty of well-known companies do it. But Tatuaje was reaching the point where most companies abandon the model in favor of a salesforce that works exclusively for one company as opposed to representing several brands.

Recently, Johnson has begun to fill vacancies in his salesforce with in-house representatives and the make-up now means there are three in-house sales representatives and six brokers.

Prediction: The trend keeps going. Tatuaje will be majority in-house by the end of next year.

8. Will Davidoff ever do anything in Nicaragua?

A few years ago, Oettinger Davidoff AG began work on a Nicaraguan operation. It found a partner, bought a farm on the side of the Panamerican highway, put up a really nice fence, and bought some building in Condega.

The company has acknowledged the land purchase, or at least a land purchase, but whatever plans existed for a production operation haven’t come to fruition. Nicaragua has been the country to watch for many years now and even companies like Fuente have invested in the area. What’s surprising about Davidoff’s venture is that the company already spent the money, it’s just unclear what it’s getting from it.

Prediction: Yes, Davidoff will do something in Nicaragua, but 2018 won’t be the year it gets done.

9. How expensive will the Cohiba Robusto Reserva be?

I suppose it’s unlikely that we will know the answer in 2018, but I’m curious to see just how expensive the Cohiba Robusto Reserva Cosecha 2004 will be, which Habanos will show off—but probably not release—in 2018.

Limited edition Cohibas are in demand and Habanos S.A. has logically begun to push the boundary on price. A year or so ago, the $200,000 humidors of the Cohiba 50 Aniversario began trickling out to retailers, but that oddly wasn’t the cigar that seemed to really show just how aggressive the company has gotten with the brand.

Last month, the Cohiba Talismán Edición Limitada 2017 showed up in the U.K. with a price of £65 ($86) per cigar, while in Germany, which has some of the lowest prices on Cuban cigars, they sell for €47 ($56). For context, the Montecristo Dántes, a 2016 Edición Limitada released earlier this year, was less than half the price. Reservas are always more expensive than Edición Limitadas, but just how aggressive Habanos S.A. will be interesting to see.

Prediction: In Germany, expect $80 per cigar.

10. When the new IPCPR ceo shows up for the first day of work, how many employees have left the organization?

You like complaining about the IPCPR, he likes complaining about the IPCPR, she likes complaining about the IPCPR, and so do its employees.

The level of discontent within the IPCPR seems to have hit an all-time high. As I’ve mentioned before, the organization has some underlying issues, namely that its board is almost exclusively retailers and the majority of its money comes from manufacturers according to financial disclosures.

There are other issues, but there certainly are disagreements between its leadership, staff and clients that get to boil over once per year when the organization host its annual trade show.

Prediction: I’ll set the over/under at two employees leaving, which would be 25 percent of the current staff. 

Posted on

Graded: The Ten Questions for 2017


Another year almost over, another Ten Questions to grade.

As loyal readers of the site are aware, my colleague Charlie Minato wraps up each year by posing 10 questions that he thinks will face the cigar industry in the coming year. Some are specific to certain companies, some are more wide-ranging, all are accompanied by a prediction for that question and then a year later, get a grade from me as to how well he did with those predictions.

(You can read the full Ten Questions for 2017 here.)

FDA remained at the top of the list once again, and while we’re a good bit closer to understanding what the regulation of premium cigars will look like, there’s still a tremendous amount to be resolved, including a lawsuit brought by the cigar industry’s three prominent lobbying entities against FDA. Yet there were plenty of other questions facing the industry over the past 12 months.

So with just a few days left in 2017, it’s time to look back at my colleague’s questions and predictions for the year and see just how he did.

Here are Ten Questions for 2017, graded.

1. Are FDA regulations suspended or overturned in 2017?

Prediction: FDA will continue to delay some parts of the deeming regulations, though likely not the larger parts as those deadlines don’t begin until 2018. Congress goes nowhere, Trump does nothing and the lawsuit is too early to have any effect in 2017.

If there was a word to describe the implementation of FDA regulations on the cigar industry in 2017, delay would be as good as any of them. Just searching FDA delay on halfwheel turns up a half dozen articles since the tail end of 2016.

Most recently, FDA delayed the submission deadline for cigar approval from May 2018 to Aug. 8, 2021. Earlier in the year, the agency agreed to delay a number of enforcement dates by 30 days in conjunction with the delay of the lawsuit between FDA and CRA, IPCPR, and CAA by 30 days.

The biggest part of FDA regulation of cigars has been pushed back substantially: the due date for substantial equivalence was originally due in 18 months following the in-effect date of regulations but it has been stretched out to five years.

As for the lawsuit, oral hearings were held in mid-December with a number of topics being discussed, including warning labels, user fees, and retailer requirements. Also brought up was how FDA commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb’s statement that the agency would be reevaluating its plans to regulate the premium cigar industry would affect where things stand now. Judge Amit Mehta made it clear that he didn’t find it right or feasible to make a ruling that would have multi-million dollar implications based on a rule that might not even be official in a year’s time. While we aren’t likely to hear Mehta’s ruling until late January, it certainly brought to light some key issues that still need to be resolved.

Which brings us to Congress. We should know more in January when Congress finally takes up the spending bill, something that could have an affect on cigars.

President Trump has also been quiet on this issue, and it’s hard to imagine him stepping up on such a relatively minor issue in the grand scheme of what’s going on in the world.

While I can’t delay giving Charlie a grade on this, he certainly used the right word to describe what most of 2017 would hold for the FDA regulation of premium cigars.

Grade: A. 

2. Do CRA & IPCPR merge?

Prediction: There will not be a merger between the two groups in 2017.

If there was one scenario I could imagine playing out in 2017, it was the merger of Cigar Rights of America (CRA) and the International Premium Cigar and Pipe Retailers’ Association (IPCPR), even though fleshing out the logistics of what such a new entity would look like was a bit challenging.

As Charlie noted, both groups were—and remain—on the same side of the FDA regulation fight, and the seeming differences between the two kept shrinking.

Charlie was correct in that there wasn’t a merger between IPCPR and CRA, and talks seem to have cooled considerably from where they were at the end of 2016.

Grade: A. 

3. How many new stores will STG (Cigars International) open in 2017?

Prediction: Five new/newly-acquired stores from STG by the end of 2017 with plans for more.

STG ended up not opening any stores in 2017, though that doesn’t mean that the company has abandoned plans to do so; it’s just going to happen in 2018.

In November, Craig Reynolds, president of Cigars International, confirmed to halfwheel that two stores were in the works for the Dallas area; specifically, one in The Colony, a suburb 25 miles north of the downtown core.

It would be hard to imagine more locations aren’t at least on a white board somewhere. However, 2017 saw none of them open, nor were there any acquisitions.

Grade: F.

4. How many new cigars will there be in 2017?

Prediction: 1,500 “new” SKUs for 2017, roughly similar to 2015.

By my most recent count, we had just crossed the 1,100 mark, though I know that our release list is in need of a bit of updating so that number is likely closer to 1,400.

While there was certainly plenty of reason to think that the flow of new cigars would dry up this year in light of FDA regulations, that was hardly the case as numerous phantom brands came to market and manufacturers continued to introduce “new” lines, sizes, and extensions. There was also the reintroduction of a number of lines, which we don’t count, but which added to the number of choices a cigar smoker had when visiting the local humidor.

Simply put, 2017 was a good year for those looking for more choices.

Grade: A-

5. Which premium cigar company is the first to be penalized by FDA?

Prediction: The first violation will be for a domestic manufacturer, likely a retail store that rolls its own cigars that is completely oblivious to the regulations. We will have to wait until 2018 to see the first nationally distributed cigar company paying fines.

To my knowledge, no stores or retailers have been penalized by the FDA for violating an aspect of the deeming regulations of premium cigars. FDA’s own violations page show that some companies have received warning letters, but largely for selling to minors or non-cigar related issues.

I think Charlie’s prediction is fairly viable in that it would likely be a store that rolls its own cigars and was either oblivious of or felt above the new regulations. Who that is remains to be seen, though.

Grade: D.

6. Will FDA regulations lead to more mergers and acquisitions of cigar companies and brands?

Prediction: Let’s put the over/under at six manufacturer/brand acquisitions for 2017. Almost as many retail stores get acquired by multi-national corporations in 2017.

If there was one part of this that was correct, it was the retail side of it, particularly under the Imperial Tobacco/Tabacalera USA/JR Cigar header, which opened stores in Nashville and Austin, acquired a new location in Boca Raton, Fla., and entered into a licensing agreement with four stores in Arizona.

On the brand/manufacturer side, it was an incredibly quiet year for mergers and acquisitions. While Rafael Nodal joined Tabacalera USA as head of product capability and Boutique Blends shifted sales and distribution under the Altadis U.S.A. umbrella, it remained an independently owned brand.

That’s not to say it was totally quiet:

What you’ll notice about many of those acquisitions is the scratching of your head. A lot of those companies have been dormant or defunct, not the type of headline news you were expecting.

I even noted in my IPCPR 2017 Day 3 recap that the rumor mill seemed much quieter this year, and I maintain that sentiment today.

So while the industry’s mergers and acquisitions departments weren’t totally quiet this year, they were certainly far less busy than Charlie predicted, and making much less flashy moves.

Grade: B.

7. Is there any company that doesn’t raise prices between August 2016 and the end of 2017?

Prediction: Many small companies won’t raise prices, but Oliva will be the only major manufacturer to absorb FDA costs in 2017.

Oliva definitely raised its prices and so did everyone else it seems.

Grade: F.

8. When does the big sell off take place?

Prediction: 2017 is going to be a great year for consumers when it comes to cigar deals. Catalogs try to sell the majority of the non-compliant inventory in 2017.

As someone who is on the mailing list of pretty much every online cigar retailer, I was eager to see just what the big sell off looked like when the dam finally broke and retailers decided it was time to clean house of non-compliant cigars.

Then, the delay was announced.

The key to Charlie’s prediction hinged on non-compliant inventory, and as we’ve covered, the FDA pushed back the deadline to get cigars submitted for substantial equivalence from May 2018 until Aug. 8, 2021. Under the previous deadline, cigars that weren’t submitted for equivalence could stay on the market until Aug. 8, 2019 before they had to be pulled from shelves, with the assumption that retailers would sell them off at fire sale prices.

With the change, cigars that were on the market prior to Aug. 8, 2016 can stay on the market for an additional two years, as long as they meet other compliance requirements, such as warning labels. That’s two additional years to sell cigars, develop the brand, and decide on whether or not to apply for the cigars to be compliant.

While the big sell off didn’t take place in 2017 as Charlie predicted, that doesn’t mean it hasn’t started in some regards and that it won’t continue in 2018. There were plenty of big sales this year and aggressive pricing, but it seems that until manufacturers and brands leave the cigar business, it will more or less look like the usual deluge of daily deals.

Yet it also might mean that with the deadline extended, companies submit more of their blends for substantial equivalence or another path to keeping them on the market, which could drastically reduce the number of cigars needing to be sold before they would have to be pulled from shelves.

Grade: C-.

9. How many new Nicaraguan factories open outside Estelí in 2017?

Prediction: There won’t be many more new factories from established companies outside of Estelí. Over/under is set at 1.5 new factories outside of Estelí for 2017.

As far as established companies, Charlie got this one correct. We’re still waiting to see exactly what Davidoff is going to do with its facility in Condega, but other than the previously announced factories from AGANORSA and A.J. Fernández, the cigar industry is staying put in Estelí.

It will be interesting to see what the updated climate is when I’m in Nicaragua for the Puro Sabor festival, and whether companies are looking to other areas of the country or think that Estelí will continue to be the hub of cigars in the country.

Grade: A.

10. Will global warming become a concern of the collective cigar industry?

Prediction: Global warming enters the fray for some in the industry, but only on the peripheral. The “big issues” for the industry remain FDA and taxes, not a big three of FDA, taxes and global warming.

If you heard me ask one question of manufacturers and growers during the Procigar or Puro Sabor festivals this past year, it was most likely about global warming, and regardless of where an individual happened to stand on the issue of causation, pretty much everyone acknowledged that something is happening with the weather.

Charlie’s prediction was correct in that it remained a minor issue in 2017, and certainly never reached the level of FDA regulation, which is understandably the most pressing issue of the moment.

Manuel Quesada Jr. told me that he and the farmers he works with are actively looking for ways to adjust to the changes that are at hand, such as altering the schedule of the growing process. If anything, since they can’t control the rains or how much sunlight they get, they are exploring ways to better deal with it. This is an industry that needs a healthy ecosystem in order to do its business, as well as one that is as predictable as possible. In turn, this may end up spurring some interesting innovations in the growing process.

Weather was a major headline for 2017, and thankfully most of it missed the tobacco growing regions. For the people who deal with growing tobacco, the changes in both weather and climate are a daily reality that they are working to address, and luckily it hasn’t caused enough issues to alarm most cigar smokers, though Cuban cigar fans and workers are certainly aware of the challenges facing that country, probably more so than most others.

Grade: A.

Posted on

Cannabis Edibles and the FDA: An Update


Cannabis edibles and the FDA
The FDA is the 800 pound gorilla of cannabis edibles.

The Food & Drug Administration (FDA) has only the jurisdiction Congress gave it in the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA). Under this act, the FDA has broad regulatory powers over legal drugs, with more limited powers over food.

Under the FDCA, the FDA categorizes a substance as either a food or a drug depending on how it is labeled or advertised. If labeling suggests the substance is “intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, or is an “article[]” (other than food) intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals,” the FDA will regulate it as a drug (except as noted below).

Cannabis edibles should stay out of the drug category if possible because drugs are subject to a comprehensive regulatory scheme that controls every part of the process, including formulation, testing for safety and efficacy, pre-clearance, manufacturing, labeling, sales, and recalls. For drug firms, the FDA is the 800-pound gorilla in the room.

The FDA categorizes food as anything people ingest that is not a drug. The FDA’s role in food is essentially hands-off. Though the FDA has promulgated hundreds of pages of food regulations, it mostly relies on food makers to self-enforce these regulations. However, when the FDA learns of regulatory violations it can and will take action.

The food/drug distinction is not always clear. In the Dietary Supplement Health & Education Act (DSHEA), Congress permitted some labeling claims for food (including dietary supplements) formerly limited to drugs. Under DSHEA, the FDA has issued regulations allowing certain specific health claims to be made on foods, e.g., “Three grams of soluble fiber from oatmeal daily in a diet low in saturated fat and cholesterol may reduce the risk of heart disease.” Food makers can also ask the FDA to permit other health claims if supported by scientific evidence. Other claims may be made, e.g., the role of an ingredient intended to affect a structure or function of the human body, under certain limited circumstances.

What does all of this mean for makers of cannabis edibles? If your cannabis label or your advertising does not make claims that bring your product within the FDA’s drug definition, the FDA will not treat your edible as a drug under the FDCA Act. This does not make it federally legal of course; it just means you won’t have to spend time having to deal with the FDA.

What if your edibles are marked with health claims or structure/function claims under DSHEA for cannabis or cannabis components, e.g., THC or CBDs? The FDA has in the past sent warning letters to firms making claims like these:

  • Studies have found CBD to possess the following medical properties: … Antipsychotic – combats psychosis disorders…combats neurodegenerative disorders … Anti-tumoral – combats tumor and cancer cells …combats…depression disorders
  • CBD helps with cancer, multiple sclerosis …diabetes, arthritis, dystonia, Crohn’s disease
  • Treats rheumatoid arthritis

The FDA has said that: “It is important to note that these products are not approved by FDA for the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of any disease. Consumers should beware purchasing and using any such products.” If you make any health claims regulated by FDA for cannabis edibles, you risk federal administrative enforcement action.

For more on what the FDA has done with marijuana, check out the following:

There may though be change on the horizon. FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb recently said that “It’s high time [pun intended?] to start looking at rules around the [cannabis] plant, which some states have legalized for medicinal or recreational use.” Gottlieb also predicted that “We’ll have some answers to this question very soon because I think we do bear some responsibility to start to address these questions.”


Stay tuned.



Posted on

Might Grassroots Motion Halt Implementation of FDA Laws?


The Trump administration has been rolling again or blocking some Obama-era guidelines from implementation, and much from being ‘simply politics’ considered one of these instantly considerations vapers deeply.


New Guidelines for The Tobacco Management Act of 2009

2016 provisions of the Act would give the FDA jurisdiction over all cigarettes, cigarette tobacco together with roll-your-own and smokeless tobacco, in addition to “another tobacco merchandise that the Well being and Human Secretary by regulation deems to be topic to this chapter”, and have been set to take impact on Might 10 or after that.


An Odd Solidarity or Enterprise Savvy?

Nevertheless, industry teams together with the Cigar Affiliation of America, a number of e-cigarette corporations, and Justice Division attorneys has challenged the rule in courtroom. They requested for a delay of three months in two courtroom instances to permit new staffers on the Well being and Human Providers extra time to return to phrases with the implications of the brand new rule, in response to the Washington submit. (1)


Postponement Of The Aug, eight Deadline

Postponed untill AugustConsequently, the FDA have postponed the Aug. eight deadlines that may have compelled sure actions, which signifies that:

  1. Cigar producers don’t should submit planning for placing ‘habit’ warnings on cigars
  2. Interstate merchandise bearing ‘low’, ‘mild’ or ‘delicate’ labels won’t be banned but.
  3. Info on actual components of cigars and e-cigarettes shouldn’t be a but authorized requirement
  4. Sure points of this rule are nonetheless in impact, similar to a provision that forbids distribution of free samples and sale of tobacco merchandise to youngsters underneath 18.

Take a look at the complete FDA regulation assessment course of to study extra.


Antiquated Definitions Regulate Trendy Know-how

R.J. Reynolds and Altria – main tobacco corporations – each personal subsidiaries within the digital cigarette industry, they usually have been urgent lawmakers on the rule. David Howard of the RJ Reynolds tobacco firm has argued that though they help a regulatory framework based mostly on the extent of danger, “antiquated laws” shouldn’t be imposed on a product class that didn’t even exist when these laws have been handed. Their argument ties in neatly with a separate invoice launched by Rep. Duncan D. Hunter (R-Calif.) that may change the FDA classifications to separate e-cigarettes from the tobacco merchandise class.

Vaping is not the same as smoking

Vaping isn’t Smoking and is More healthy than Tobacco

Vaping proponents contend that digital smoking merchandise will help people who smoke to give up flamable cigarettes. In Europe, the place vaping units are marketed and bought as smoking cessation aids, e-cigarettes have assisted 6.1 million individuals to give up smoking. Ample analysis finds vaping 95 % much less dangerous than flamable cigarettes.

This looks like a convincing argument for the US, the place 480,00zero People die from smoking yearly in accordance with CDC statistics. And nonetheless, the FDA gained’t acknowledge the potential of digital cigarettes to save lots of lots of of hundreds of American lives.
Verify Out The Greatest E Cigs To Give up Smoking

Critics Give attention to the Attraction of E-cigarettes to Younger Individuals

The FDA filed a quick final August claiming that vaping has elevated from 1.5 as much as 13.four % amongst college students and argued that “Vaping has advanced into an industry that’s focused at our youngsters” and that “nicotine habit might have critical and lifelong well being impacts.”

Dare we level out that the final reality is incontrovertible?


In the meantime, Business is Hurting

A considerable variety of lawmakers appear to aspect with the industry on this sharp coverage shift from the earlier administration, and a few senior Trump officers have ties to the tobacco and vaping industries. Ray Story is the president of the Tobacco Vapor Digital Cigarette Affiliation and has commented that present regulation could also be curbed as a result of “it’s dangerous for enterprise.”

Actually, at the least two e-cigarette gamers (NJOY and Digital Cigarettes Worldwide Group Ltd.) have gone out of enterprise because the rule took impact. You possibly can learn the complete influence of the laws to determine for your self.


Elsewhere, Some Grassroots Motion

Hartland, Wisc., is a village of 9,200 individuals and is house to a producer of vaping liquid, Johnson Creek Enterprises. This firm is a big financial driver locally, and implementation of the FDA rule’s archaic definitions may have a devastating financial influence on the group.

However they gained’t go down and not using a battle. The Hartland Board of Trustees plans on sending a decision to Washington, D.C., which they consider may save the nation’s vaping industry, and in addition many lives.


FDA is Obligated to Talk about Financial Results of Guidelines on Native Communities

The Nationwide Environmental Coverage Act of 1976 requires the FDA to think about the financial impression and in addition different results the principles might impose on native communities. The Hartland, Wisc., Board of Trustees have collected proof that the FDA broke federal regulation when it carried out its vaping regulation with out “coordination” they usually plan to submit their findings to the Division of Well being and Human Providers and the FDA for evaluation.


Startling Outcomes Might Ensue

In response to the Board of Trustees, the group hopes to show that the FDA didn’t coordinate or seek the advice of with the area people earlier than enacting the rule and that the rule can be “null and void” not solely in Hartland however nationwide. The FDA might nicely want to problem the Hartland group, by which case the matter would in all probability head to courtroom.

“I’m disgusted and appalled that one thing that’s 95 %, perhaps extra, more healthy than cigarettes is being lambasted with a regulation that may severely restrict the power of nicotine addicts to reside more healthy lives by means of vaping,” stated Jeff Pfannerstill, village board president. “It crosses a line from stupidity to madness.” (2)